首页> 外文OA文献 >Public private partnerships: only for the well-off? Evidence from the rural productive partnership project in Colombia

【2h】

Public private partnerships: only for the well-off? Evidence from the rural productive partnership project in Colombia

机译：公私合作伙伴关系：仅适用于富裕阶层？来自哥伦比亚农村生产伙伴关系项目的证据

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper focuses on assessing the evidence that Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) work well for producers from vulnerable backgrounds and/or located in post conflict zones. Looking at data from the Rural Productive Partnership Project (PAAP), a decade long program designed to overcome market barriers in Colombia, and using a combination of statistical and econometric techniques such as principal component analysis, survival models and impact assessment methods, results reveal that partnerships with vulnerable populations perform similar to others with better off participants. Partnerships in post-conflict zones perform slightly worse than those in other areas. Additionally, there is no difference in the duration of agribusiness contracts, regardless of producers’ backgrounds and location in a post-conflict zone or not. The impact assessment exercise confirms an increase in households’ sales of the PAAP product. These findings suggest that market access PPPs such as the PAAP can be inclusive, helping to link marginalized smallholder farmers to modern agricultural value chains.

机译：本文着重评估证据，证明公私伙伴关系（PPPs）对于弱势背景和/或冲突后地区的生产者而言效果很好。查看农村生产合作伙伴计划（PAAP）的数据，该计划旨在克服哥伦比亚的市场障碍，历时十年，并结合了统计和计量经济学技术（例如主成分分析，生存模型和影响评估方法），结果表明：与弱势群体的伙伴关系在表现更好的参与者方面与其他伙伴表现相似。冲突后地区的伙伴关系的表现略逊于其他地区。此外，无论生产者的背景和在冲突后地区的位置如何，农业综合企业合同的期限都没有差异。影响评估活动证实了家庭购买PAAP产品的销量增加。这些发现表明，诸如PAAP之类的市场准入PPP具有包容性，有助于将边缘化的小农户与现代农业价值链联系起来。

著录项

作者
Parra-Peña, Rafael Isidro; Lundy, Mark; Bischler, Jana; Astorquiza, Bilver Adrian; Hurtado, John Jairo;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2016
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 en
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Public and Private Partnership Research Opportunities: An Overview of Grain-Based Projects That Could Benefit from a Public and Private Partnership [J] . Nutrition today . 2016,第6期

机译：公私合作研究的机会：可以从公私合作中受益的粮食项目概述
2. Macro-Economic Risk Factors on Perfomance of Public Private Partnership Renewable Energy Projects: Evidence from Geothermal Renewable Energy Projects in Kenya [J] . Kenneth Otieno Odhiambo, Charles M. Rambo, Stephen Lucas Okello Journal of Finance and Economics . 2020,第2期

机译：公私合营可再生能源项目绩效的宏观经济风险因素：肯尼亚地热可再生能源项目的证据
3. Factors influencing the consideration of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) for smart city projects: Evidence from Hong Kong [J] . Cities . 2020,第Apra期

机译：影响智慧城市项目考虑公私合营（PPP）的因素：来自香港的证据
4. THE MODEL OF PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN COLOMBIA AS A MODEL FOR FINANCING OF SPACE PROJECTS IN LATIN AMERICA [C] . Camilo Guzman Gomez, Pilar Zamora International astronautical congress . 2016

机译：哥伦比亚电信中的公共-私人合作模式作为拉丁美洲空间项目融资的一种模式
5. Emergence of Private Sector in Public-Private Partnership Projects and Analysis of Relationship between Stakeholder Network Centrality and Project Performance [D] . Suwal, Sirish. 2019

机译：公私伙伴关系项目中私营部门的出现及利益相关方网络中心地位与项目绩效的关系分析
6. Operation mode selection of NIMBY facility Public Private Partnership projects [O] . Hui Zhao, Jingqi Zhang, Yuanyuan Ge, 2021

机译：NIMBY设施公共私人合作项目的操作模式选择
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Public private partnerships: only for the well-off? Evidence from the rural productive partnership project in Colombia

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅